Several problems that are easily overlooked in the process of binding production

1. Wire-binding is not suitable for paperback books that have more than 5 printed sheets, especially those made with 32-page art paper. The wireless binding process may not provide sufficient strength. Even when using hot-melt adhesive on coated paper, the bonding might not be strong enough. The stack of pages can feel as rigid as cardboard, and the glue line on the back of the book is prone to breaking, causing the spine to tear easily.

2. Books with an unusually thick spine cannot be produced using the wire-binding method. This often results in the middle of the book block being difficult to open. Additionally, the center of the spine may become concave, leading to a rounded edge and structural deformation over time.

3. For reference books such as periodicals or textbooks that are not intended for long-term preservation, wire-binding may not be the best choice. It tends to be more expensive and less efficient in production compared to other methods.

4. Student textbooks are usually thin and have a short usage period, so they can be bound using the wire-binding process. However, for books with collection or archival value—such as reference books or special editions—it's essential to use a hardcover binding instead. Wire-binding is not recommended due to its limited durability. Over time, factors like temperature, humidity, and handling can cause the adhesive to weaken, leading to delamination or breakage after just a few years.

Overall, choosing the right binding method is crucial for both the longevity and functionality of a book. While wire-binding offers convenience and cost-effectiveness for certain types of publications, it's important to consider the material quality, usage duration, and preservation needs before making a decision.